Comments on: Open licenses for archaeological data matter: the case of AustArch https://archaeology.okfn.org/2014/07/29/open-licenses-for-archaeological-data-matter-the-case-of-austarch/ Open Data from the past Thu, 31 Jul 2014 19:50:17 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.8 By: Stefano Costa https://archaeology.okfn.org/2014/07/29/open-licenses-for-archaeological-data-matter-the-case-of-austarch/#comment-176 Thu, 31 Jul 2014 19:50:17 +0000 http://archaeology.okfn.org/?p=77#comment-176 There’s a fairly extended discussion of the issues presented here on the working group mailing list: https://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-archaeology/2014-July/thread.html with input from several members and the ADS staff.

]]>
By: Ben https://archaeology.okfn.org/2014/07/29/open-licenses-for-archaeological-data-matter-the-case-of-austarch/#comment-175 Tue, 29 Jul 2014 23:12:33 +0000 http://archaeology.okfn.org/?p=77#comment-175 This is a great observation about the impact of choice of data license on CRM workers. Victoria Stodden has also dealt with the question of licenses for research output in her ‘Reproducible Research Standard’ which recommends CC-BY for media (text and figures), MIT for code (data analysis scripts) and CC-0 for data. See here for more details: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1362040

]]>